Published by Jason September 23rd, 2005
in 3 Stars and Subaru.

Let�s get it right out in the open. This car looks weird. It is far from elegant and beautiful, far from sleek and sexy, far from what you even think of when you think of Subaru. To put it simply, it�s sort of homely. With that said however, I can�t go so far as to say that it�s ugly, or hideous.
If you look at the right pictures of it, it looks sort of like a mutated CR-V, or a RAV4, slightly stretched and a little higher off the ground. From other angles, it looks more like a Honda Odyssey or some other as-close-to-a-minivan-without-actually-being-a-minivan-thing that you can get. In my opinion, it�s the backend that�s the most unforgiving, like some sort of alien Cyclops.
Once inside, it plays the same story over again. Not an especially elegant interior, but not necessarily offensive either. It feels a little over-designed actually, and in some cases, there are some things that are so different that you almost feel that they made it unique just to be different, not to be better. The dials are easy to read, but not always presented in an intuitive fashion, the temperature controls are nice with integrated temp displays inside the rotating temperature knob, and the navigation system has a touch screen.
Related Posts
Review: 2007 TribecaQuick Review: Subaru Forester 2.5 XTReview: 2008 Subaru ImprezaReview: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR
Published by Jason September 8th, 2005
in 3.5 Stars and Volvo.
For this week’s test I had the opportunity to drive about 1500 miles with two 700+ days of driving. I was looking forward to a more in-depth review with some opportunities not always available with other reviews. Namely, how does this car really feel after being in it for 12 hours straight. Well, when it comes to the Volvo V50, it just feels all right.
Clearly I could have done worse for this trip. I can’t imagine if I would have gotten a Nissan Titan or other ridiculously sized vehicles, or even a two-seater; the wife and I had luggage you know. But as it turns out, wagons make great road-trip cars. We filled this one with two bags of clothes, some food, and a wake board. The back seat laid down nicely and I had no problem fitting it all in. My wife and I hopped in, and we too fit well. It is definitely a smaller car though, which you notice as soon as you sit down and realize how close the passenger is to you.
The biggest and largest complaint I have about this car is that the brake pedal crowds the gas pedal, and there is little room to slide your foot past the brake pedal and onto the gas. When wearing my standard running shoes, which I wear everyday and drive all my cars in, I couldn’t get it past without lightly brushing the brake pedal. This was very annoying and I was irritated after 45 seconds in the car. Luckily, I noticed this the day before the trip, and for the long drive, brought narrower Puma sneakers, which solved the problem. However, it still very irritating to not be able to wear the shoes you want because the pedals are unnecessarily close together. My shoes are a size 12 by the way, not small, but not ginormous either.
Related Posts
Review: 2008 Volvo V70Review: 2007 Volvo XC90Driving around in the mud at MudfestVolvo S80 V8 AWD